Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 5:45:32 GMT
The Earth as if it were a rabbit that requires our help and to convey this message, we share images of emaciated polar bears and invite people to incite this action in favor of the environment without realize the true situation of the planet. “Our planet does not need us to save it. The biosphere has endured cataclysms much worse than the one we represent and after millions of years it prospered again. Even the five feared mass extinctions on Earth became possibilities for the creativity of the biosphere and generated new rounds of evolutionary experiments,” says Adam Frank. These cycles have shown that the Earth doesn't need our help and that its biosphere will eventually take care of virtually anything we throw at it, like climate change and human abuses. They say that we do not have to save the Earth but rather adapt to it.
Tweet this sentence. Although the Earth has also shown that species do not take the correct measures soon, it will continue its course and its evolution with or without it will promote the creation of new versions that can adapt to the new cycle. “Let's be honest: the problem is not saving the Earth or life in general, but Argentina Mobile Number List saving our valued civilization. From that perspective, the nature of our options changes significantly,” he mentioned. After the last ice age, which ended more than ten thousand years ago, planet Earth entered a period of stability known as the “Holocene”, where the evolution of the human race is centered. “The entire history of our civilization occurs within this stage. All of our revolutions in agriculture, city building and industry have happened during the "Holocene." But this period is ending now and we have caused it,” he commented. Scientists point out that with the end of the "Holocene", a new cycle will change things on Earth. However, Frank points out that creating a long-term sustainable version of civilization in the Anthropocene raises a profound new set of questions that will remain a mystery to us as long as we remain obsessed with saving the Earth. So… What should we do? Adam Frank mentions that our mission should not focus entirely on eliminating the impact we have caused because taking into account our lifetime, this objective becomes impossible. Instead it recommends a cooperative relationship with the biosphere.
Which means understanding what the biosphere does and its behavior: “However, it is unlikely that all species on Earth will make that journey with us,” he points out. Scientists mention that if we try to extend the "Holocene", instead of adapting to the coming changes with sustainable and responsible thinking, we will face much more serious consequences. Climate change will accentuate extreme poverty and inequality “Recognizing this does not absolve us of the need to act urgently. It does not justify climate change denial or ecological vandalism. Nor does it mean that we are free to impose suffering on other terrestrial creatures,” he points out. Which means that accepting the true scale of our responsibilities to the planet means that we must become agents of something the Earth has not seen before: a biosphere that is self-aware and can act toward its future with compassion and wisdom. What do you think? Do we have to save the Earth or not.
